Trumbull Satellite Project—Part 8: Experience Evaluation

Trumbull Satellite Logo| Introduction |
| PART 1 | PART 2 | PART 3 | PART 4 |
| PART 5 | PART 6 | PART 7 | PART 8 |

| Rules & Regulations |

DUE May 1, 2024 (11:59pm, EST)
(25 Points)

  • First of all, remember that your evaluation will be read by both the Content Manager and myself.
  • Be honest. Be professional.
  • Review your previous Experience Evaluation.
  • What has changed or not changed since then?
    • Have the staff meetings been useful? How so, or how not? Why do you think so?
    • Do you feel that your work community is healthy or toxic?
    • How realistic do you think this “job” is so far?
    • Where is the power in this experience—who has power, who doesn’t? Is this a good situation, in terms of empowerment? Why or why not?
    • What is your assessment of Trumbull Satellite‘s voice within the KSU culture and/or beyond the KSU culture? Is it empowered, or ignored? Why?
    • (Not being paid can be included here, but remember that you are earning course points.)

How to Submit Your Work to Me & the Content Manager
You have options:

  1. Via KSU Google Document (see “How to Use KSU Google”: share with clrobins@kent.edu &  cblest@kent.edu).
  2. As a well composed email (sent to clrobins@kent.edu & to cblest@kent.edu).
  3. As a document (PDF or a word processor document) attached to an email sent to me and to the Content Manager (to clrobins@kent.edu & to cblest@kent.edu)

How Your Work Will Be Evaluated
Your project will be evaluated in terms of:

    • how close it comes to being what was indicated as being intended in your proposal
    • its professional appearance (form) and content
      • no “glitches” or other sloppiness
      • it should demonstrate genuine progress on your work
    • provides evidence of significant work completed thus far

GRADING RUBRIC

An A level evaluation demonstrates critical thinking about the relationships between Trumbull Satellite, power, and culture. It has significant depth of thought. It is professionally composed.

A B level report demonstrates some critical thinking about the relationships between Trumbull Satellite, power, and culture. It has some depth of thought. It is mostly professionally composed.

A C level report demonstrates a hint of critical thinking about the relationships between Trumbull Satellite, power, and culture. It does not have much depth of thought. It is professionally composed.

A D level report does not demonstrate critical thinking about the relationships between Trumbull Satellite, power, and culture. It has very little depth of thought. It is professionally composed.

An F level report does not demonstrate critical thinking about the relationships between Trumbull Satellite, power, and culture. It lacks depth of thought. It is not professionally composed—sentences are more like notes, gobbledygook.